As an addendum, it is my understanding that the Earth's climate has a lot of moving parts, and that it sometimes (often?) behaves differently than expected.  So, when making predictions, you have to speak in terms of possibilities and probabilities rather than certainties--especially when it comes to trying to forecast what the weather will be like over an upcoming season (which is undoubtedly quite challenging).  

So, once again, you did pretty good with making a seasonal forecast that was more accurate than one based on random chance would have been.

As an aside, you're all very highly trained and educated (I think most of you have PhD's, plus I suspect most of you have years [if not decades] of experience with weather forecasting), plus you're using some very powerful computers to make forecasts, to say nothing of how you are getting weather data and forecasts from other meteorological agencies around the world (which undoubtedly improves your forecasts).  

What you are doing (forecasting the weather both for the coming days and the upcoming season) is not easy: It would take years of education and experience to be able to do what you do, and even more time to make it look easy.

Besides, I know your forecasts have improved over the years, and that they are more accurate now than they have ever been, so we all benefit.  And, I have no doubt that they will continue to improve over the coming years, because of better computers, better programs, more and better data--and highly skilled meteorologists who know how to put those to use.