Skip to main content

The polar vortex is hitting the brakes

For much of this winter season, the polar vortex winds at 60°N have been racing around the stratospheric polar region. During February alone, these west-to-east winds were two times stronger than normal for that time of year. However, the latest forecasts suggest that the polar vortex is about to switch gears with a major vortex disruption to happen this weekend. Read on to find out why the polar vortex could be bottoming out early this season.

time series of stratospheric winds

Observed and forecasted (NOAA GEFSv12) polar vortex wind speeds at 60°N (bold blue line) compared to the natural range of variability (faint blue shading). Since mid-November, these stratospheric winds have been stronger than normal (thin blue line). However, that’s about to change as the latest forecasts (issued March 3, 2025) indicate the winds at 60°N are going to dramatically decrease over the next few days (bold purple line), indicating a polar vortex disruption. The big question is whether these winds will rebound toward their normal strength before the end of the season. NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

Stratospheric pit stop

At the time of writing this post, the polar stratospheric west-to-east winds are still speeding around the Arctic [footnote #1], but forecasts suggest they are not only going to come to a screeching halt by the weekend, but they are then going to strongly reverse direction. When this wind reversal (i.e., winds become east-to-west) occurs at 60°N and 10 hPa (~19 mi/30 km above us), it’s called a sudden stratospheric warming. As the name suggests, these major polar vortex disruptions are linked to incredible stratospheric temperature increases over a short period of time [footnote #2]. For this upcoming event, temperatures in the mid-stratosphere could increase as much as 45°F (25°C) in less than 5 days.

time series of stratospheric temperatures

Observed and forecasted (NOAA GEFSv12) polar cap temperatures compared to the natural range of variability (faint orange shading). Since October, these stratospheric temperatures (bold red line) have been colder than normal (thin red line). This is expected because strong polar vortex winds act as a barrier between cold Arctic air and warmer mid-latitude air. As the polar vortex becomes disrupted, the stratosphere will warm quickly and intensely (bold pink line), hence the name sudden stratospheric warming. NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

Sudden stratospheric warming events usually come in two possible flavors in which the polar vortex either displaces off the pole or splits into two smaller vortexes. This particular event may be a bit of both. The initial warming event kicks off with the polar vortex shifted toward Europe, but the forecasts also show pieces of the vortex splitting off from the main lobes several days later.

Will the polar vortex rev its engine again?

One of the big questions regarding this polar vortex disruption is whether the stratospheric winds at 60°N will recover and become west-to-east again, extending the polar vortex season (and its ability to influence weather patterns) into late spring. Forecasts [footnote #3] do not currently show a recovery, so this pit stop may be the end of the vortex’s racing season. If this turns out to be the case, then it would be classified as a “final stratospheric warming” rather than a major sudden stratospheric warming.

As we discussed in last season’s post, final warmings occur every spring as sunlight returns to the North Pole and the temperature differences between the equator and pole decrease. As a result, the west-to-east winds that are maintained by that temperature difference decrease and transition to east-to-west winds. This transition usually happens sometime in mid-April, but there have been 5 years since 1958 when final warmings occurred before March 15.  Like this year, those years corresponded to winters without a mid-winter sudden stratospheric warming [footnote #4].

A potential stratosphere-troposphere fender bender

contour plot of atmospheric thickness anomalies over polar cap

Differences from average atmospheric thickness (“standardized geopotential height anomalies”) in the column of air over the Arctic for the stratosphere and troposphere. Since the beginning of the year, low-thickness anomalies (purple shading indicative of a stronger than average polar vortex) have dominated the stratosphere but only periodically coupled down to the troposphere. Latest forecasts show a dramatic change with thickness anomalies increasing (orange shading), consistent with a polar vortex disruption. These stratospheric anomalies are preceded by tropospheric anomalies of the same sign, hinting at a nudge from below. However, it’s too soon to tell whether these stratospheric anomalies will then drip down into the troposphere again. Standardized anomalies are based on departures from the 1991-2020 Climate Forecast System Reanalysis climatologies and have been divided by the standard deviation. Data are from the Global Forecast System observational analysis and forecast.

Regardless of whether this is the final warming or the vortex decides to ride again, both have the potential to impact our weather this spring. Disruptions to the polar vortex can communicate down to the troposphere and disrupt the jet stream. These disruptions to the jet stream can bring colder than normal Arctic air down into the eastern United States. 

Now this doesn’t mean you need to bring your winter tires back out while your garden tools continue to collect dust. First, it’s too soon to tell whether this vortex disruption will make its way down to the troposphere as the latest forecast doesn’t show much stratosphere-troposphere interaction after the onset of the warming event. Second, though the impacts of March sudden warmings are very similar to those in mid-winter, spring is coming, so any Arctic air brought down in the US won't "feel" as cold compared to if it happened in January because we are in a warmer part of the year.

Even if the polar vortex season ends early this year, we’re hoping to have at least 1 or 2 more posts (including a guest author) so stay tuned!

Footnotes

[1] We spent several posts this winter talking about the strong, but sometimes stretchy, polar vortex and what that has meant for our winter weather. If you’re interested, please read more here, here, and here.

[2] The sudden increase in temperature over such a short period of time occurs for a couple of reasons.  As the polar winds weaken and reverse direction during a major sudden stratospheric warming, there is a component of the air that moves poleward and descends rapidly over the Arctic and pressure increases. As the air descends it warms: this is one of the reasons why the temperatures can increase so impressively during a major warming event. Furthermore, the polar vortex winds act as a barrier between cold Arctic air and warmer mid-latitude air. When the winds/barrier weaken, warmer mid-latitude winds can enter the polar stratosphere and contribute to increasing temperatures.

[3] We show the American GEFS model in these posts, but the ECMWF model currently doesn’t show a vortex recovery in the next several weeks either.

[4] The link between winters with a sudden warming and late season final warmings (and correspondingly, years without a sudden warming and early season final warmings) is thought to be due to the tug of war in the stratosphere between dynamic and radiative processes that control the strength of the polar vortex. In particular, if a sudden warming occurs during mid-winter, the polar stratospheric winds will be pulled towards returning to a west-to-east flowing state to balance the stratospheric temperature gradient created by lack of sunlight over the pole. If this recovery of the stratospheric winds to west-to-east flow occurs, it provides potentially weeks to months of additional time for planetary waves to interact with the winds, extending the timing of the final warming until much later. On the other hand, if the sudden warming occurs near the spring equinox, when sunlight has returned to the pole, the stratospheric winds feel no radiative force to return to a west-to-east state, and so often the winds will stay east-to-west (corresponding to an early season final warming). 

Comments

  • All comments are placed in moderation and must be approved by one of the blogging team. We do not monitor comments 24/7. Please be patient and do not post your comment multiple times.
  • We will not publish comments that are off topic, or that contain profanity, name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. 
  • We will not post comments that include links to blogs or websites unrelated to the post topic.
  • On occasion we may edit a comment before we post it. We will always indicate if we have done so.

Thanks for your info and work on this. Sure hope it's a minimal effect and short term. Have mercy already, thanks.

In reply to by laura.ciasto

Just curious if the votes has decided to go for the season and the weather does start warming up early. What are the impacts that this can have around June when hurricane season starts? Does this warming event actually contribute more to a possibly more active tropical activity? 

Great question!

To my knowledge, there's a not an established link between the stratospheric polar vortex and hurricanes. This is partly due to the fact that the hurricane season doesn't really coincide with the times when the polar vortex is most active. So I don't think there'd be a huge impact on the overall activity of the hurricane season.

That said, there's the possibility that the timing of the final warming could impact hurricanes in June. One of the main impacts of the stratospheric warmings on the troposphere is to disrupt the jet stream. If there was a late final warming (say early May) and any resulting disruptions to the jet stream persisted for several weeks, then that could impact hurricanes formed in June. But I'm mostly speculating here. It'd be an interesting area to research in the future!

I really appreciate this information, it is facinating to learn more about the weather. Thank you.

Thank you for this very informative blog - wonderfully written and illustrated as always. Do you know which 5 years had an earlier FWE before 15th March please? 2016 I have but dataset is limited to > 1980

What has happened to the polar jet stream? It doesn't look anything like it used to. Will it ever look like those official images, such as the one you posted on this blog on 12/5/23 as if it were one solid band? Some days it looks more like a bowl of spaghetti.

The jet stream (not to be confused with the stratospheric polar vortex) never looks as simple as it does in the schematic. It also depends on what level in the atmosphere you are looking at. If you're interested, go to: https://earth.nullschool.net and play around with the different levels such ass 500 and 250-hPa.

That said, it has seen a lot of action this winter. One way we can measure the jet stream stream is through an index called the Arctic Oscillation (also called the AO). When the AO is negative, it means the jet stream is much wavier. This season has seen several instances of a negative AO.

In reply to by Julia

The latest forecasts do show some downward propagation, which suggests the US might feel some impacts of the stratospheric warming by the end of March/early April. But like we said, the impacts of the polar vortex won't "feel" as strong as they do in January because  temperatures are warmer this time of year.

Add new comment